INTRODUCTION
Mangling hand injuries are a rare and challenging problem for reconstructive surgeons. In such cases, surgeons should consider soft tissue reconstruction with early functional recovery. Numerous free flaps are available for the reconstruction of hand defects, including radial forearm, anterolateral thigh (ALT), thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP), and circumflex scapular artery perforator flaps. Recently, perforator free flaps have been commonly used for hand reconstruction because of their versatility, thinness, and minimal donor site morbidity [
1,
2]. The authors thought that the TDAP free flap can be the most suitable flap for reconstructing complex hand injuries because its thinness enables patients to retain their earlier ability to pinch and grasp and the donor site on the back is less exposed than that on the extremity [
3].
Herein, we report two cases of mangled hand after a press machinery injury treated with a TDAP free flap in two patients. We discuss the results with a literature review.
DISCUSSION
Mangled hands are high-energy injuries that are rare and challenging to manage. These injuries usually occur in the workplace and in the healthy young population. Sufficient function of the hands must be restored so that the patient can return to work and perform daily activities. If a staged reconstruction is planned, the decision on the parts to be discarded or salvaged is crucial during the initial surgery. The debridement of contaminated and non-viable tissue, stabilization of the fractures, and replantation of the remaining vessels should be achieved. Then, definitive reconstruction could be performed if the wound is demarcated and no further debridement is necessary. Appropriate soft tissue reconstruction for defects is an important aspect. It not only provides cover for soft tissue defects but also restores function and affects early recovery [
4]. Many possible flaps can be used for reconstruction. In our institution, the most frequently used free flaps for hand reconstruction are the radial artery superficial palmar branch perforator (RASP) [
5], ALT [
1], and TDAP flaps [
2,
3].
The perforator free flaps have recently been used mainly for the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the hand [
6]. The ALT flap has become popular because it is known to be relatively easy to elevate, have low morbidity at the donor site, and allow broad applicability [
1,
7]. In the past, the authors usually used RASP and ALT flaps depending on the size of the defects to cover. ALT flaps were mainly used for large defects for which RASP flaps could not be used. However, the authors thought that the ALT flap has the disadvantage of being too bulky for hand reconstruction [
6]. The ALT flap with a thinning procedure or superficial fascial elevation can be performed with removal of a considerable amount of deep fatty tissue however, it may cause partial flap necrosis and is technically demanded [
1]. The TDAP flap could be a reliable option to substitute the ALT flap [
2,
3,
8]. The main reason for selecting the TDAP free flap is its thinness and the less exposure of the donor site in the back for resurfacing. The back has superficial and deep adipose layers comparing with the thigh [
8]. The TDAP flap can be harvested at a thickness of approximately 5 mm to 1 cm by flap elevation, excluding the deep adipose layer [
8]. A thin flap facilitates rapid sensory recovery and the earlier recovery of the abilities to pinch and grasp [
3]. It was reported that ALT flaps can be thinned to a thickness of approximately 3 to 4 mm [
1]. Depending on the surgeon’s proficiency and the patient’s own fat layer, the superiority of thinness between ALT and TDAP is thought to be controversial.
Compared with other flaps, the TDAP flap has additional advantages in that the donor site on the back is less exposed and wider flap harvesting is possible. All donor muscles and nerves can be preserved, the pedicle length can be easily controlled and large flap dimensions of up to 20×10 cm can be elevated with simple primary closure [
8]. Several perforator free flaps can be harvested from the back, such as the circumflex scapular artery perforator flap [
9]. However, this flap should be harvested in the prone position. The TDAP flap could be applied without intraoperative changes in position. In addition, the area of the drape is narrow, as it is performed near the back of the ipsilateral side of the hand reconstruction. The narrow drape could be related to the low infection rate and convenience of operation for surgeons.
The TDAP flap was thought to be quite difficult and time-consuming to elevate. After several trials, it is no longer as difficult as previously experienced, even though the TDAP flap takes less time to harvest than the ALT flap because of its short transmuscular dissection through the thin latissimus dorsi muscle [
2].
The second case showed an anatomical variation of the princeps pollicis artery (
Fig. 6). The princeps pollicis artery is the main feeding vessel of the thumb, which usually branches from the deep palmar arch. An anatomical variation in the location where the princeps pollicis artery would branch was reported. In some rare cases, the princeps pollicis artery branches from the superficial palmar arch or the dorsal branch of the radial artery. The princeps pollicis artery supplies the dominant blood flow to the thumb. It is important in microsurgery because of the lack of collateral blood flow [
10]. Microsurgeons should consider the anatomical variation of the princeps pollicis artery when performing thumb replantation.
As described earlier, successful reconstruction of mangled hands was possible using TDAP free flaps. The TDAP flap is suitable for hand reconstruction because of its short transmuscular course and large flap with easy primary closure. The results showed an aesthetically acceptable scar, early functional recovery, and minimal donor site morbidity. Owing to these advantages, a TDAP free flap can be a reliable option for soft tissue reconstruction of the hand.